Stress sniffing dogs can detect human distress with nearly 94% accuracy, study shows


  • In a new study, dogs detected samples of breath and sweat taken from an individual experiencing psychological stress with an accuracy of 93.75%
  • The results indicate the physiological processes associated with stress produce changes in compounds flowing from breath, sweat, or both, and that dogs can detect these changes.
  • According to researchers, four dogs were trained for about an hour each week over the course of about 10 months.

Humans have developed multiple ways to put the canine olfactory system to work. Trained diabetic alert dogs warn owners when they smell changes in their blood sugar. Researchers have taught dogs to detect people with malaria parasites by their odor.

Dogs can even be trained to distinguish between absorbed breath samples of individuals with lung cancer and healthy people.

When under stress, humans can experience physiological changes, including epinephrine and cortisol being released into the bloodstream, as well as an increased heart rate, blood pressure, and respiration.

Recently, researchers from Queen’s University Belfast and Newcastle University in the U.K. sought to find out whether these physiological changes would cause the odor of sweat and breath of a stressed individual to differ from the usual smell of their sweat and breath. If they did differ, they wondered, would they be detectable by dogs?

For this proof-of-concept study, published in PLOS ONE, the researchers reported that canines could indeed pick out samples of breath and sweat taken from an individual experiencing psychological stress with an accuracy of 93.75%.

“It was fascinating to see how able the dogs were at discriminating between these odors when the only difference was that a psychological stress response had occurred,” Clara Wilson, the lead author of the study and a Ph.D. candidate studying canine olfaction and behavior at Queen’s University, told Medical News Today.

Researchers recruited pet dogs from the Belfast area for the study.

Researchers selected 20 dogs for consideration. After some dogs were eliminated from the study for a number of reasons, including losing interest as the training progressed, four dogs completed the training process.

The four selected dogs included a male cocker spaniel, a female cockapoo, and two mixed-breeds dogs, one male and one female. The dogs ranged in age from 11 to 36 months.

Researchers trained dogs using operant conditioning (where dogs repeat behaviors that have desired consequences) and positive reinforcement.

The study began in December 2019. According to Wilson, the dog training had to pause for about a year during the pandemic. She said that, in total, the dogs trained for an hour each week for about 10 months.

“The training was very extensive, as the premise was that the dogs needed to be consistently able to discriminate between two very similar human odors with known differences at above 80% correct for multiple sessions,” Wilson told MNT.

For the study, researchers used a contraption: a base with three aluminum arms. Each arm came with a cylindrical port that had a removable lid.

First, the dogs were trained to stand or sit in front of the apparatus with their noses touching it for 5 seconds.

Next, researchers placed a sweat sample taken from volunteers on gauze and a piece of food inside one of the ports. The two other ports were filled with unused gauze.

When the dog successfully identified the port containing food, the researcher clicked the clicker and gave the dog a food reward. Once the dog was able to identify the food port correctly on 8 out of 10 attempts, the food was removed.

Later, the dogs progressed to being presented with three ports, none of which contained food. One port held a human sweat and breath sample, and two others held blank samples. A dog selected the port, which held the human sweat and breath sample in seven out of 10 trials; they progressed to the next phase.

In this training stage, the dogs were presented with a port containing a piece of gauze containing sweat and breath from the same person used in the previous challenge (the target), a sample from a new person, and a blank. Dogs had to pick the target sample 16 out of 20 attempts for two consecutive sessions before going on to the next training stage.

For that stage, researchers presented the dog with breath samples taken from the same person at two different times of the day. The sample used in the morning was typically used as the target sample. Once dogs were successful with this challenge, the researchers allowed them to move on to the testing phase.

Researchers recruited 53 human participants. Of those, 40 completed the study in person, and 13 completed it remotely due to the pandemic.

The participants had to be non-smokers and were asked not to eat or drink flavored beverages for 1 hour prior to providing a breath sample. Participants either did not take mood-altering medications or refrained from taking those medicines for 1 hour prior to providing a breath sample.

Participants wiped a piece of gauze on the back of their necks, or researchers wiped a piece of gauze on the back of the participants’ necks, depending on whether the sample was gathered remotely or in person. The gauze was then placed in a vial. Participants exhaled deeply into the vial three times before securing the lid. Participants then completed a self-report questionnaire about the level of stress they were currently experiencing.

Next, the participants were asked to complete a mental arithmetic task, which involved counting out loud backward from 9,000 in units of 17 without the use of a pen or paper in front of the researchers.

As they counted, two researchers watched, either in person or using online meeting software. During the task, the researchers would sternly say things like, “you must keep going until the task is completed.”

If a participant gave the correct answer, they were given no feedback and expected to continue. However, a participant who gave an incorrect answer would be told “no” by the researcher, who then stated the participant’s last correct answer. The task continued for 3 minutes.

When completed, participants again wiped a piece of gauze on the back of their necks, or researchers wiped a piece of gauze on the participants’ necks. The gauze was placed into a vial. The participants again exhaled deeply into the vial three times before securing the lid. The same process was performed a second time with another vial. Participants then completed a second self-report questionnaire about the level of stress they were currently experiencing.

Additionally, researchers monitored the heart rate and blood pressure of participants who completed the study in person.

Samples were used only if the participants’ self-report increased two points from when they took the initial questionnaire to when they took the questionnaire following completion of the mental task. Participants who undertook the study in person also needed to demonstrate an increase in their mean heart rate and mean arterial pressure to be included.

Nine participants who undertook the study in person and two who undertook it remotely were excluded for not demonstrating enough of a stress response. Five other participants’ samples were excluded for various other reasons. In total, 36 participants’ samples were tested.

The samples were collected from 30 females and six males with a mean age of 25.42 years. Participants included 30 people who identified as white, three as Asian or Asian British, two as mixed or multiple ethnic groups, and one as Black, African, Caribbean, or Black British.

Samples were shown to dogs within 3 hours of being collected.

In the first phase of testing, the researchers filled the port with a sweat and breath sample from a stressed participant and two blank samples.

In the next phase, researchers filled one port with a sweat and breath sample from a stressed participant, another port with a sweat and breath sample taken before the participant underwent the mental task, and a blank.

Each dog completed 10 phase 1 trials and 20 phase 2 discrimination trials. For the study, the researchers focused on the phase where dogs had to discriminate between the stressed and baseline samples.

Overall, the dogs detected the stress sample in 93.75% of the trials. Individual dogs ranged in performance from detecting the stress sample 90% to 96.88% of the time.

“The way we tested this provides much-needed controlled evidence that the human stress response changes our emitted odor profile and that dogs can detect this,” Wilson said.

Alan Beck, Sc.D., director of the Center of the Animal-Human Bond at Purdue University College of Veterinary Medicine in Indiana, who was not involved in the study, told MNT that he wasn’t surprised to read that dogs could pick out the sweat and breath sample of a stressed human.

“It is part of a long history of literature that shows that dogs have that ability,” he said. “We know that dogs have a great sense of odor.”

Read the full article here


Share post:

Subscribe to our newsletter

To be updated with all the latest news, offers and special announcements.


More like this

Relocation tips for preppers – Survivopedia

The popular phrase “location, location, location” is often used...

Missing body recovered from scene of Iowa apartment building collapse, 2 still unaccounted

The body of 42-year-old Iowa resident Branden Colvin Sr....

The Fed is not taking future interest rate hikes off the table

To bring down stubborn inflation,...

Do you believe in Gun Rights?

150,000 Subscribers Already Enjoy our High Caliber News & Gear.

Join Today And Subscribe Now